Compare

Equity vs Salary

Equity conserves cash but carries risk and uncertain value, while salary is certain and taxed as ordinary income immediately. Most startups use a mix, weighted towards equity when cash is limited and towards salary as the company matures.

Cash impact
Equity: none upfront. Salary: recurring cash cost
Certainty
Salary: fixed and guaranteed. Equity: depends on company performance
Timing of the tax bill
Salary taxed as income when paid, equity often taxed later and differently
Effect on other shareholders
Equity dilutes existing shareholders, salary does not

Balancing guaranteed cash with long term ownership upside

Salary is a fixed cash payment made regularly regardless of company performance, taxed as ordinary income as it is earned. Equity, whether shares or options, gives the recipient a stake in future company value, which could be worth a great deal or nothing at all depending on how the company performs. Startups often use equity to compensate for below market salary, especially at seed and Series A stage when cash is scarce, which is one reason equity management matters early on.

  • Salary must be paid whether or not the company succeeds, drawing down cash reserves
  • Equity has no cash cost to the company but dilutes existing shareholders
  • Equity value depends entirely on a future sale or exit event, salary is realised immediately, so the exit payout mechanics decide what a grant is worth
  • A combination of below market salary plus equity is the most common structure at early stage European startups

Risk and reward across cash and equity components

FeatureEquitySalary
Cash cost to companyNoneOngoing, monthly
Value to employee if company failsZeroFull amount, as long as paid
Tax timingUsually later, on exercise, vesting or saleImmediate, each pay period
Effect on cap tableDilutes shareholdersNo effect
Attractiveness to risk averse candidatesLowerHigher

Optimising compensation mix for startups and scaleups

Cash constrained early stage startups typically weight compensation towards equity to preserve runway, accepting that this only appeals to candidates comfortable with risk. As a company raises larger rounds and revenue grows, salaries typically move closer to market rates, with equity becoming a smaller top up rather than the main incentive. Senior hires joining at a later stage, when risk is lower, usually expect salary closer to market rate with a modest equity grant rather than a large stake with low pay, granted through the same stock options mechanics used earlier on.

This page is general information about compensation structure, not advice on how to set pay or comply with local employment or tax law.

Balancing cash and equity: what founders ask

How much equity should replace a shortfall in salary?
There is no fixed formula. Companies typically size grants against a percentage of the company and expected vesting period, then judge whether that feels fair relative to the salary gap and risk taken on.
Does equity reduce payroll tax and social charges?
It can, since many equity instruments are not treated as salary for social charge purposes, but this depends heavily on the country and the instrument used.
Should equity replace salary entirely?
This is uncommon and risky for the employee, since equity may never pay out, and most employment laws require at least a minimum wage to be paid in cash.

General information for founders, not legal or tax advice. Thresholds and rates change, so confirm the current position with an adviser in the relevant country before granting.

Managing equity pay alongside options and tax

Subscribe to equity insights for European founders

Get concise updates on employee equity, tax changes and founder decisions.